Mannerist architecture was characterized by
visual trickery and unexpected elements that challenged the renaissance norms.
Flemish artists, many of whom had traveled to Italy
and were influenced by Mannerist developments there, were responsible for the
spread of Mannerist trends into Europe north of the Alps ,
including into the realm of architecture. During the period, architects experimented
with using architectural forms to emphasize solid and spatial relationships.
The Renaissance ideal of harmony gave way to freer and more imaginative
rhythms. The best known architect associated with the Mannerist style, and a
pioneer at the Laurentian Library, was Michelangelo (1475–1564). He is credited
with inventing the giant order, a large pilaster that stretches from the bottom
to the top of a façade. He used this in his design for the Campidoglio in Rome.
Prior to the 20th century, the term
Mannerism had negative connotations, but it is now used to describe the
historical period in more general non-judgmental terms. Mannerist architecture
has also been used to describe a trend in the 1960s and 1970s that involved
breaking the norms of modernist architecture while at the same time recognizing
their existence. Defining mannerist in this context, architect and author
Robert Venturi wrote "Mannerism for architecture of our time that
acknowledges conventional order rather than original expression but breaks the
conventional order to accommodate complexity and contradiction and thereby
engages ambiguity unambiguously."
Architecture
The architecture Mannerist born from the
tradition established by Renaissance architects such as Alberti , Filippo
Brunelleschi and Bramante in the fifteenth century and early sixteenth, which
derived their inspiration mainly from ancient treatises as Vitruvius and Roman
ruins that remained visible from antiquity and served as memento perennial of
the grandiose classical past, whose influence had never been lost to the
Italians at all. The perspective developed in the fifteenth century and the
growing importance of drawing as an auxiliary of knowledge were fundamental
elements for the development of the classicist architectural style, which
reached a high point in works such asPazzi Chapel and the Tempietto of
Bramante, which consecrated the system of proportions and the organization of
the typical spaces of the High Renaissance.
Being classicism established with great homogeneity
in the early sixteenth century, its revision introduced by Mannerism also
affected the constructive style. The tradition of Treatiseism declines and
there arises a new generation of strongly individualistic architects who
allowed themselves great formal freedoms and made the transition from the
Renaissance to the Baroque. Vasari said in his Vitethat earlier architects had
brought architecture to a high level of quality, but lacked an element that
prevented them from achieving perfection - freedom. Describing architecture as
a system of definite rules, he declared that new buildings should follow the
example of the ancient classical masters, keeping the whole in order and
avoiding a mixture of disparate elements. In this line of ideas he added that creative
freedom, while falling short of some rules, was not incompatible with order and
correction, and had the advantage of being guided by the judgment of the
creator himself. Gradually this position gained resonance, leading to an
abandonment of the old orthodoxy and opening space for free experimentation,
making coexistence of different points of view acceptable. The example of
Michelangelo,considered by Vasari as the only one of the masters of the
previous generation to conquer this desired freedom, and whose personal and
individualistic engagement in all his activities was unusual at a time when
collective labor was the rule, led the new architects to produce more and more
works unique and personal. With this the traditional methodology of the high classicism
goes into crisis. The dialogue between the various artistic specialties is
broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of construction within
the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of the literary and
intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This did not, however,
prevent the classical elements from continuing to be employed, but in an
eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the demands of the new
society.and whose personal and individualistic engagement in all his activities
was unusual at a time when collective labor was the rule, led the new
architects to produce ever more unique and personalistic works. With this the
traditional methodology of the high classicism goes into crisis. The dialogue between
the various artistic specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve
the problems of construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without
the tutelage of the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of
professionalism. This did not, however, prevent the classical elements from
continuing to be employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and
adapted to the demands of the new society.and whose personal and
individualistic engagement in all his activities was unusual at a time when
collective labor was the rule, led the new architects to produce ever more
unique and personalistic works. With this the traditional methodology of the
high classicism goes into crisis. The dialogue between the various artistic
specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of
construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of
the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This
did not, however, prevent the classical elements from continuing to be
employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the
demands of the new society.led the new architects to produce more and more
unique and personal works. With this the traditional methodology of the high
classicism goes into crisis. The dialogue between the various artistic
specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of
construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of
the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This
did not, however, prevent the classical elements from continuing to be
employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the
demands of the new society.led the new architects to produce more and more
unique and personal works. With this the traditional methodology of the high
classicism goes into crisis. The dialogue between the various artistic
specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of
construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of
the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This
did not, however, prevent the classical elements from continuing to be
employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the
demands of the new society.The dialogue between the various artistic
specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of
construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of
the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This
did not, however, prevent the classical elements from continuing to be
employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the
demands of the new society.The dialogue between the various artistic
specialties is broken, and architects now seek to solve the problems of
construction within the sphere of architecture itself, without the tutelage of
the literary and intellectual, and with a new sense of professionalism. This
did not, however, prevent the classical elements from continuing to be
employed, but in an eclectic and experimental approach, and adapted to the
demands of the new society.
Among the architects who stood out in Italy are
Andrea Palladio , Giulio Romano , Antonio da Sangallo , Giacomo della Porta and
Jacopo Vignola . Of all of them, Palladio, the most influential architect of
Mannerism and what has been studied most in the history of Western
architecture, was perhaps also the most
classicist among the Mannerists, as can be seen in his masterpiece Villa
Rotonda , but nevertheless introduced significant variations in the classic
canon , and its large series of villasaristocratic displays of an extraordinary
variety of schemes of distribution of elements and organization of space. He
and his contemporaries deconstruct the canon by playing with illusions of
perspective, alteration in structural rhythms, distortion of the functionality
of certain elements, and sensitive flexibility in the proportions of volumetry,
and his interpretation of classicism was compared to the evolution of Platonic
idealism to the artistotelic empiricism .
In other European countries the classical
tradition was mixed with local roots, derived from the Gothic and the Romanesque
, giving rise to Portugal , for example, the Manueline , with its maximum
monument in the Jeronimos Monastery , where Gothic remains the most influential
important, and leaving marks also in its colonies of Brazil and India . In Spain he created the Plateresque , a unique case
of a mixture between classical, Gothic and Moorish influences , with significant examples at the University of Salamanca
, inChurch of Santo Estêvão also in Salamanca ,
in the University of Alcalá de Henares and in several buildings in the
American colonies of Mexico
and Peru
. The end of the century would see in Spain a resumption of classicism ,
with abandonment of decorative excesses and adoption of greater austerity.
In France ,
the classicism was immediately welcomed with enthusiasm from the fifteenth
century, producing many architectural monuments of great value as the Castle of Chambord
, the Chateau de Fontainebleau , and parts of the Louvre Palace
, which perform a Mannerist fact summary, associating medieval features to
those of the Renaissance. Likewise in the Netherlands
a very peculiar palatial style of architecture was formed, compact, very
decorated and with a high frontispiece, where the City Hall of Antwerp
is a typical example. In other countries
the Frederiksborg Palace in Denmark is significant; in Poland the City Hall of
Poznań and Zamość ; parts of Heidelberg Castle in Germany; the Wollaton Hall ,
the Hardwick Hall , the Burghley House and Longleat in England, just to name a
handful. Finally some additional names of Mannerist architects: Bernardo
Morando , Michele Sanmichele , Philibert Delorme , Cornelis Floris de Vriendt ,
Bernardo Buontalenti , Giovanni Battista di Quadro and Robert Smythson .
Michele Sanmichele: Palazzo Grimani
Giovanni Battista di Quadro: Poznań prefecture
Robert Smythson; Wollaton Hall
Cornelis Floris de Vriendt: Antwerp City Hall .
Renaissance examples
An example of mannerist architecture is the
Villa Farnese at Caprarola. in the rugged country side outside of Rome . The proliferation
of engravers during the 16th century spread Mannerist styles more quickly than
any previous styles.
Dense with ornament of "Roman"
detailing, the display doorway at Colditz
Castle exemplifies this
northern style, characteristically applied as an isolated "set piece"
against unpretentious vernacular walling.
From the late 1560s onwards, many buildings
in Valletta , the new capital city of Malta , were
designed by the architect Girolamo Cassar in the Mannerist style. Such
buildings include St. John's
Co-Cathedral, the Grandmaster's Palace and the seven original auberges. Many of
Cassar's buildings were modified over the years, especially in the Baroque
period. However, a few buildings, such as Auberge d'Aragon and the exterior of St. John's Co-Cathedral,
still retain most of Cassar's original Mannerist design.
One of the best examples of Mannerist
architecture - Palazzo Te in Mantova, designed by Giulio Romano
Giulio Romano, Pallazo Ducale in Mantova
Own house of Giulio Romano in Mantova
Baldassare Peruzzi, Palazzo Massimo alle
Colonne in Rome
Michelangelo, vestibule of Laurentian
Library
Source From Wikipedia
没有评论:
发表评论