2018年10月31日星期三

Bi-fuel vehicle

Bi-fuel vehicles are vehicles with multifuel engines capable of running on two fuels. On internal combustion engines one fuel is gasoline or diesel, and the other is an alternate fuel such as natural gas (CNG), LPG, or hydrogen. The two fuels are stored in separate tanks and the engine runs on one fuel at a time in some cases, in others both fuels are used in unison. Bi-fuel vehicles have the capability to switch back and forth from gasoline or diesel to the other fuel, manually or automatically.

The most common technology and alternate fuel available in the market for bi-fuel gasoline cars is Autogas (LPG), followed by natural gas (CNG), and it is used mainly in Europe. The Netherlands and the Baltic states have a large number of cars running with LPG. Italy currently has the largest number of CNG vehicles, followed by Sweden. They are also used in South America, where these vehicles are mainly used as taxicabs in main cities of Brazil and Argentina. Normally, standard gasoline vehicles are retrofitted in specialized shops, which involve installing the gas cylinder in the trunk and the LPG or CNG injection system and electronics.

Diesel conversions
Diesel engine is compression ignition engine and does not have spark plug. To operate a diesel engine with an alternate combustible fuel source such as Natural gas, Dual-Fuel system used. Natural gas as the main fuel while diesel fuel is used for the ignition of the gas/air mixture inside the cylinder (a portion of diesel is injected at the end of the compression stroke, thereby maintaining the original diesel operation principle)

Dual fuel operation means the engine uses two fuels (gas and diesel) at the same time, as opposed to Bi Fuel which would mean the engine could have the option of using either fuel separately.

There usually two type of conversions - low speed (below 1000 RPM) and high speed (between 1200 and 1800 RPM).

Low and middle speed conversion
Gas is injected into the cylinder inlet manifold by individual gas electromagnetic valves installed as close to the suction valves as possible. The valves are separately timed and controlled by injection control unit. This system interrupts the gas supply to the cylinder during the long overlap of the suction and exhaust valves (just typical for slow-speed and medium-speed engines – within the valve overlap cylinder scavenging is performed). This avoids substantial gas losses and prevents dangerous gas flow to the exhaust manifold.

This conversion is adjusted for low speed engines up to 1000 RPM.
System for conversion of industrial diesel engine to Bi-fuel operation by substitution of 70-90% natural gas for diesel or HFO.
Gas is injected directly before intake valve by high speed electromagnetic injector, one or two injector per each cylinder.

High speed conversion
Gas is mixed with air by a common mixer installed before turbocharger(s). Gas flow is controlled by a throttle valve, which is electronically operated by the special control system according to the required engine output and speed. In order to avoid knocking of the engine, knocking detector/controller is installed, thus enabling engine operation at the most efficient gas/diesel ratio.

Suitable for all High Speed engines, 1200-1800 RPM.
System for conversion of industrial diesel engine to Bi-fuel operation by substitution of 50-80% natural gas for diesel.
Gas and air are blended behind air filter before turbocharger by central mixer.

Common conversion features
Substantial savings on operation costs
Practically no engine modification required
Non-derated output power
Fuel flexibility: Possibility of bi-fuel or original pure diesel operations
Safe operations.
Lower emissions
Longer engine life span, longer service and maintenance intervals
Gas types used
It is common to use CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) or LNG (Liquid Natural Gas) for bi-fuel operations. Both are also mostly used for Generator sets conversions, because the engine does not lose the output power.

In recent years biogas is being used. The biogas composition and calorific value must be known in order to evaluate if the particular biogas type is suitable. Calorific value may be an issue as biogas is derived from different sources and there is low calorific value in many cases. You can imagine you have to inject sufficient volume of gas into the cylinder to substitute diesel oil (or, better to say, substitute energy delivered by diesel oil). If the calorific value (energy) of the biogas was very low, there is a need to inject really big volume of biogas into the cylinder, which might be technically impossible. Additionally, the composition of the biogas has to lean towards ignitable gases and be filtered as much as possible of uncombustible compounds such as CO2.

Associated gas is the last type of gas which is commonly used for bi-fuel conversions of generator sets. Associated gas is a natural gas found in association with oil, either dissolved in the oil or as a cap of free gas above the oil. It means it has almost the same quality as CNG or LNG.

Diesel/gas ratio
It depends on the technical state of the engine, especially of the injection system. The typical Diesel / Gas ratio is 40/60% for the high-speed engines. If the operating output of the engine is constant and between 70-80% of nominal output, than it is possible to reach up to 30/70% ratio. If the operating output is lower (for example 50% of the nominal output) or if there are variations, the rate is about 45/55% (more of diesel is used).For Low Speed conversions it is possible to reach the Diesel/gas ratio up to 10/90%. Generally, it is not possible to guarantee an exact diesel/gas ratio without a test being done after the conversion.

LP gas, natural gas etc. combined with other fuel
LPG, CNG (compressed natural gas) and those using gasoline as a reserve fuel are most popular. This is because gasoline can be used as a reserve fuel because infrastructure for supplying gas is not yet sufficient. It is also called 1 engine • 2 fuel system.

Especially, the engine of most LPG cars in Europe and North America is bifuel. LPG cars reached about 9 million units worldwide (2005) 15.8 million in 2010, about 2 million CNG vehicles (2005) 15 million units are spreading in 2010. However, many of them are bi-fuel vehicles that can hold and use gasoline as a reserve fuel. The reason for this is that most of the gas fueled cars are remodeled from gasoline cars. In Europe, even dealers can be remodeled so that they can attach car stereos.

Gas vehicles as substitute fuels are popular because of low cost and cleanliness of exhaust gases (Netherlands, France, Paris City, Britain, London etc.) because there are no driving restrictions in cities. At that time, it is a system developed as a "preliminary fuel-like" usage method to alleviate the fear of "fuel out".

Manufacturers that are mass-producing bi-fuel vehicles are few, and as of 2004, only Volvo is mass-produced by automobile manufacturers all over the world, LPG • CNG produces 8 models with sedan and wagon. The number will be nearly 20,000 vehicles per year. (LPG production discontinued in 2006, CNG production was canceled in 2009, then redeveloped in the manufacturer genuine rear attachment system). From 2000, India • Multi Suzuki is marketing LPG, CNG version as wagon R plus, and in the 2010s, Korea Kia is entering the bi-fuel mass-production car with 1 L car "Morning".

Situation in Japan
Having two types of fuel supply schemes with one engine is "uneconomical and can not make use of the characteristics of the fuel," many Japanese automobile engineers say. However, Volvo solved this with NECAM of the Netherlands and Denso of Japan. We develop and sell mass-produced engines that can produce the same output and maximum efficiency regardless of which fuel is used. Exhaust gas level is also equivalent to EURO 5 and high reliability. Volvo has been developing since 1995, and in 2005 it celebrated 10 years since its development and sales.

In Japan, it is a remodeled car of LPG cars, Nippon Oil (presently JXTG Energy) as "LPi system" LP gas liquid injection method of Viale of the Netherlands, Tanaka Motors as "ELPI system" of proprietary gas injection system Mitsubishi sells many fuel vehicles, and CNG cars are sold by Mitsubishi. Along with the strengthening of emissions regulations, as of 2010, 95% of LPG modified cars and 70% of CNG modified cars became bi-fuel. Main system maker is Randy Lenzo, Italy, Hana Engineering Japan in Japan, Hana Engineering Japan, HKS and others.

Also, in forklift trucks, when selecting an LPG car, it becomes a bi-fuel vehicle of LPG and gasoline. When propane gas can not be obtained, gasoline is sometimes used.

Other combinations
Other bi-fuels have a combination of the same type engines like "<hydrogen and gasoline", "DME and light oil" and different fuel types. The former is Mazda and BMW, the latter is studied by Korea Imaha University and Japan's CoPe low pollution car development and it is nearing practical use.

In Europe, bi-fuel of diesel and gas fuel is being developed by Randy Lenzo and Germany • Prince Gas.

Bifuel is essentially a system that guarantees insufficient infrastructure when substitute fuel is used, and there are many practical examples in other countries. However, due to the benefits of being able to use both fuels, "the priority is to use low-priced fuels" and "the cruising distance is doubled", diffusion is spreading not only in Europe but also in emerging countries and gas-producing countries. In mass production cars by Japanese automobile manufacturers, practical examples are not mass production examples except Fuji Heavy Industries' Subaru and Sambar.

Brazil
Pro-alcohol
In 1975, before the second oil crisis (1979), the Brazilian government created Pro-alcohol, a program to increase the production and distribution of alcohol, obtained mainly from sugarcane and cassava, as an alternative fuel.

Brazil has all the conditions for the production of sugarcane, that is, adequate soil, large areas and abundant sun. After the initial difficulties of the alcohol engine, such as corrosion and cold starting difficulties, the success of the program was so much that in the mid -1980s almost all cars produced had engines fueled by the so-called green fuel. However, at the end of the same decade, the increase in the price of sugar, coupled with the fall in the price of oil on the international market, led to the shortage and near extinction of the program.

Alcohol
The Brazil is the second largest producer of ethanol World, the world's largest exporter, and is considered the international leader in the field of biofuels and the first economy in use have reached a sustainable of biofuels.  Together, Brazil and the United States lead ethanol production, accounting for 70% of world production in 2006 and nearly 90% of ethanol fuel. In 2006 Brazilian production was 16.3 billion liters, equivalent to 33.3% of the world's ethanol production and 42% of ethanol used as fuel in the world. The projection of total production for 2008 is 26.4 billion liters. The Brazilian ethanol industry has 30 years of history and the country uses sugarcane as an agricultural inputin addition, by regulation of the Federal Government, all gasoline marketed in the country is mixed with 24% ethanol, and already 5 million vehicles, cars and light commercial vehicles circulate in the country, which can run with 100% ethanol or any another combination of ethanol and gasoline, and are popularly called "flex" cars.

The story began to change on 23 of March of 2003, when a car model Volkswagen Gol is released as the first to work with more than one fuel at the same time, if gasoline and ethanol in any proportion, which provides the choice of the cheapest fuel at the time of supply.

Almost all models manufactured in the country come equipped with flex engine.

Advantages
Besides being able to generate a great economy, given the instability of fuel prices, it is a weapon against pollution and global warming, because it can use renewable fuels and less harmful to the environment.

Vehicles
Aftermarket 'bi-fuel' and even 'tri-fuel' conversions are also available.

Factory bi-fuel passenger cars
Fiat Punto
Fiat Siena Tetrafuel, with a gasoline flex-fuel engine and natural gas (CNG).
Holden Commodore dual-fuel (LPG/petrol)
Fiat Multipla 1.6 BiPower (CNG/petrol) and 1.6 BluPower (CNG)
Chevrolet Cavalier
Dacia Duster BiFuel)
Dacia Logan BiFuel
Dacia Sandero BiFuel
Ford Contour
Mazda RX-8 Hydrogen RE
Premacy Hydrogen RE Hybrid
Chevrolet SPARK Bifuel
Volkswagen Polo BiFuel (LPG/petrol)
Volkswagen Golf BiFuel (LPG/petrol)
Mazda 2 BiFuel (LPG/Petrol)
Mercedes-Benz E200-NGT BiFuel (CNG/Petrol)
Lada Vesta CNG (CNG/Petrol).

Factory bi-fuel pickups
Chevrolet Silverado
Ford F-150, F250

Source from Wikipedia

2018年10月23日星期二

Steam car

A steam car is a car (automobile) powered by a steam engine. A steam engine is an external combustion engine (ECE) where the fuel is combusted away from the engine, as opposed to an internal combustion engine (ICE) where the fuel is combusted within the engine. ECEs have a lower thermal efficiency, but it is easier to regulate carbon monoxide production.

The first steam powered vehicle was supposedly built in 1672 by Ferdinand Verbiest, a Flemish Jesuit in China. The vehicle was a toy for the Chinese Emperor. While not intended to carry passengers, and therefore not exactly a "car", Verbiest's device is likely to be the first ever engine-powered vehicle. The first real experimental steam powered cars were built in the late 18th and 19th centuries, but it was not until after Richard Trevithick had developed the use of high-pressure steam, around 1800, that mobile steam engines became a practical proposition. By the 1850s it was viable to produce them commercially: steam road vehicles were used for many applications.

Development was hampered by adverse legislation from the 1830s and then the rapid development of internal combustion engine technology in the 1900s, leading to their commercial demise. Relatively few steam powered vehicles remained in use after the Second World War. Many of these vehicles were acquired by enthusiasts for preservation.

The search for renewable energy sources has led to an occasional resurgence of interest in using steam power for road vehicles.

Technology
A steam engine is an external combustion engine (ECE: the fuel is combusted away from the engine), as opposed to an internal combustion engine (ICE: the fuel is combusted within the engine). While gasoline-powered ICE cars have an operational thermal efficiency of 15% to 30%, early automotive steam units were capable of only about half this efficiency. A significant benefit of the ECE is that the fuel burner can be configured for very low emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and unburned carbon in the exhaust, thus avoiding pollution.

The greatest technical challenges to the steam car have focused on its boiler. This represents much of the total mass of the vehicle, making the car heavy (an internal combustion-engined car requires no boiler), and requires careful attention from the driver, although even the cars of 1900 had considerable automation to manage this. The single largest restriction is the need to supply feedwater to the boiler. This must either be carried and frequently replenished, or the car must also be fitted with a condenser, a further weight and inconvenience.

Steam-powered and electric cars outsold gasoline-powered ones in many US states prior to the invention of the electric starter, since internal combustion cars relied on a hand crank to start the engine, which was difficult and occasionally dangerous to use, as improper cranking could cause a backfire capable of breaking the arm of the operator. Electric cars were popular to some extent, but had a short range, and could not be charged on the road if the batteries ran low.

Early steam cars, once working pressure was attained, could be instantly driven off with high acceleration; but they typically take several minutes to start from cold, plus time to get the burner to operating temperature. To overcome this, development has been directed toward flash boilers, which heat a much smaller quantity of water to get the vehicle started, and, in the case of Doble cars, spark ignition diesel burners.

The steam car does have advantages over internal combustion-powered cars, although most of these are now less important than in the early 20th century. The engine (excluding the boiler) is smaller and lighter than an internal combustion engine. It is also better suited to the speed and torque characteristics of the axle, thus avoiding the need for the heavy and complex transmission required for an internal combustion engine. The car is also quieter, even without a silencer.

The steam engine is a type of external combustion engine. Therefore it differs from the internal combustion one due to the fact that the fuel is burned out of the real engine. On cars with this type of traction the heart of the traction system is the steam generator (or boiler), whose task is to produce the steam necessary to move the engine. The steam is generated by the heat produced by the combustion of a fuel, which occurs in a burner . In order for the engine to produce movement, the steam must be generated at specific operating conditions (ie at a certain pressure) and in sufficient quantities. After being produced, the steam under pressure is sent to the actual engine, where it generates mechanical energy thanks to the movement of the pistons. As a thermodynamic cycle, the steam engine describes a Rankine cycle.

On the steam cars of the early 20th century, the boiler was the most important component of the car. This weight was higher than that generated by the gearbox and clutch group of internal combustion engine vehicles. In fact, thanks to the great torque that was provided at all regimes, the steam engine was connected directly to the drive wheels without using the two mechanical components mentioned. Cars with this type of traction, once the operating pressure had been reached, could in fact be started with considerable accelerationbecause the energy was stored in the boiler thanks to the steam, and therefore the power was deliverable in full at any time and at any regime . In addition, the large cooling fans associated with the steam engine also weighed more than the gearbox and friction of cars with internal combustion engines. So, on the whole, this greater weight canceled the advantage that the steam engine had to work without the gearbox (when the engine was still, the engine was stationary, and therefore it did not waste energy with the rotation in neutral). From the upper mass, it also ensured that the steam cars were, as a rule, globally heavier than the cars with internal combustion engines, and therefore their conduction required more attention from the driver .

Another important restriction of the steam engine of the early 20th century models was the supply of water to the boiler. At the time, in fact, the mentioned liquid had to be transported and added frequently because the cars produced up to the early twentieth century dumped the vapor into the atmosphere. In order to avoid these frequent top-ups, a condenser was installed on the following models, ie an additional rather bulky, heavy apparatus which also gave rise to many drawbacks, the purpose of which was to condense and recycle the exhausted steam . The condenser looked like a radiatorof internal combustion cars but, compared to it, had larger dimensions that were due to the heat exchange content; the latter, in fact, had to be - as well as larger - even faster. In addition to being very voluminous, the condenser had to be exposed to the air due to the significant subtraction of heat that had to be realized. The same thing was not necessary for the actual engine which, also due to its limited size and the fact that it was connected to simple pipes to the boiler and the condenser, was instead placed in the most convenient position for driving the driving wheels., for example under the floor.

In addition to those mentioned, for steam cars of the early twentieth century, however, there was another major problem: the time needed to achieve operational conditions. In fact, it took more than a minute to get them and to make the engine start. To solve this limitation, on the models produced later a type of boiler was developed where the times of reaching the operating temperature were much shorter than those of a traditional one, since a small amount of water was heated in it. The latter provided the engine with enough energy to start the vehicle before the entire amount of liquid was heated. On the Doble steam carsmore recent, there was also a burner ignition system that operated on diesel fuel and which further accelerated this phase.

However, the steam engine had many advantages. The engine (excluding the boiler) was in fact much smaller and lighter than the internal combustion engine. It was also better suited to run at a higher speed and required a simpler transmission than that required by a car with an internal combustion engine since, as already mentioned, the gearbox and the clutch were missing . The car was also much quieter even without a muffler (in fact there were no " explosions " in the engine). Another undoubted advantage of the steam engine, in addition to its noiselessness, was that in this engine the combustion was continuous. Therefore, the burner could be configured in such a way as to have an optimal combustion minimizing atmospheric pollution thanks to the low emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides andunburnt hydrocarbons in the exhausts.

History

Early history
A French inventor, Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot, built the first working self-propelled land-based mechanical vehicle. There is an unsubstantiated story that a pair of Yorkshiremen, engineer Robert Fourness and his cousin, physician James Ashworth had a steam carriage running in 1788, after being granted a British Patent, No.1674 of December 1788. An illustration of it even appeared in Hergé's book Tintin raconte l'Histoire de l'Automobile (Casterman, 1953). The first substantiated steam carriage for personal use was that of Josef Božek in 1815. He was followed by Thomas Blanchard of Massachusetts in 1825. Over thirty years passed before there was a flurry of steam cars from 1859 onwards with Dugeon, Roper and Spenser from the United States, Thomes Rickett, Austin, Catley and Ayres from England, and Innocenzo Manzetti from Italy being the earliest. Others followed with the first Canadian, Henry Taylor in 1867, Amédée Bollée and Louis Lejeune of France in 1878, and Rene Thury of Switzerland in 1879.

The 1880s saw the rise of the first larger scale manufacturers, particularly in France, the first being Bollée (1878) followed by De Dion-Bouton (1883), Whitney of East Boston (1885), Ransom E. Olds (1886), Serpollet (1887), and Peugeot (1889).

This early period also saw the first repossession of an automobile in 1867 and the first getaway car the same year - both by Francis Curtis of Newburyport, Massachusetts.

1890s commercial manufacture
The 1890s were dominated by the formation of numerous car manufacturing companies. The internal combustion engine was in its infancy, whereas steam power was well established. Electric powered cars were becoming available but suffered from their inability to travel longer distances.

The majority of steam powered car manufacturers from this period were from the United States. The more notable of these were Clark from 1895 to 1909, Locomobile from 1899 to 1903 when it switched to gaosoline engines, and Stanley from 1897 to 1924. As well as England and France, other countries also made attempts to manufacture steam cars: Cederholm of Sweden (1892), Malevez of Belgium (1898-1905), Schöche of Germany (1895), and Herbert Thomson of Australia (1896-1901)

Of all the new manufacturers from the 1890s, only four continued to make steam cars after 1910. They were Stanley (to 1924) and Waverley (to 1916) of the United States, Buard of France (to 1914), and Miesse of Belgium (to 1926).

Volume production 1900 to 1913
There were a large number of new companies formed in the period from 1898 to 1905. Steam cars outnumbered other forms of propulsion among very early cars. In the U.S. in 1902, 485 of 909 new car registrations were steamers. From 1899, Mobile had ten branches and 58 dealers across the U.S. The center of U.S. steamer production was New England, where 38 of the 84 manufacturers were located. Examples include White (Cleveland), Eclipse (Easton, Massachusetts), Cotta (Lanark, Illinois), Crouch (New Brighton, Pennsylvania), Hood (Danvers, Massachusetts; lasted just one month), Kidder (New Haven, Connecticut), Century (Syracuse, New York), and Skene (Lewiston, Maine; the company built everything but the tires). By 1903, 43 of them were gone and by the end of 1910 of those companies that were started in the decade those left were White which lasted to 1911, Conrad which lasted to 1924, Turner-Miesse of England which lasted to 1913, Morriss to 1912, Doble to 1930, Rutherford to 1912, and Pearson-Cox to 1916.

Assembly-line mass production by Henry Ford dramatically reduced the cost of owning a conventional automobile, was also a strong factor in the steam car's demise as the Model T was both cheap and reliable. Additionally, during the 'heyday' of steam cars, the internal combustion engine made steady gains in efficiency, matching and then surpassing the efficiency of a steam engine when the weight of a boiler is factored in.

Decline 1914 to 1939
With the introduction of the electric starter, the internal combustion engine became more popular than steam, but the internal combustion engine was not necessarily superior in performance, range, fuel economy and emissions. Some steam enthusiasts feel steam has not received its share of attention in the field of automobile efficiency.

Apart from Brooks of Canada, all the steam car manufacturers that commenced between 1916 and 1926 were in the United States. Endurance (1924-1925) were the last steam car manufacturer to commence operations. American/Derr continued retrofitting production cars of various makes with steam engines, and Doble was the last steam car manufacturer. They ceased business in 1930.

Resurgence - enthusiasts, air pollution, and fuel crises
From the 1940s onward, various steam cars were constructed, usually by enthusiasts. Among those mentioned were Charles Keen, Cal Williams' 1950 Ford Conversion, Forrest R Detrick's 1957 Detrick S-101 prototype, and Harry Peterson's Stanley powered Peterson. The Detrick was constructed by Detrick, William H Mehrling, and Lee Gaeke who designed the engine based on a Stanley.

Charles Keen began constructing a steam car in 1940 with the intention of restarting steam car manufacturing. Keen's family had a long history of involvement with steam propulsion going back to his great-great-grandfather in the 1830s, who helped build early steam locomotives. His first car, a Plymouth Coupe, used a Stanley engine. In 1948 and 1949, Keen employed Abner Doble to create a more powerful steam engine, a v4. He used this in La Dawri Victress S4 bodied sports car. Both these cars are still in existence. Keen died in 1969 before completing a further car. His papers and patterns were destroyed at that time.

In the 1950s, the only manufacturer to investigate steam cars was Paxton. Abner Doble developed the Doble Ultimax engine for the Paxton Phoenix steam car, built by the Paxton Engineering Division of McCulloch Motors Corporation, Los Angeles. The engine's sustained maximum power was 120 bhp (89 kW). A Ford Coupe was used as a test-bed for the engine. The project was eventually dropped in 1954.

In 1957, Williams Engine Company Incorporated of Ambler began offering steam engine conversions for existing production cars. When air pollution became a significant issue for California in the mid-1960s the state encouraged investigation into the use of steam-powered cars. The fuel crises of the early 1970s prompted further work. None of this resulted in renewed steam car manufacturing.

Steam cars remain the domain of enthusiasts, occasional experimentation by manufacturers, and those wishing to establish steam-powered land speed records.

Impact of Californian legislation
In 1967, California established the California Air Resources Board and began to implement legislation to dramatically reduce exhaust emissions. This prompted renewed interest in alternative fuels for motor vehicles and a resurgence of interest in steam-powered cars in the state.

The idea for having patrol cars fitted with steam engines stemmed from an informal meeting in March 1968 of members of the California Assembly Transportation Committee. In the discussion, Karsten Vieg, a lawyer attached to the Committee, suggested that six cars be fitted with steam engines for testing by California District Police Chiefs. A bill was passed by the legislature to fund the trial.

In 1969, the California Highway Patrol initiated the project under Inspector David S Luethje to investigate the feasibility of using steam engined cars. Initially General Motors had agreed to pay a selected vendor $20,000 toward the cost of developing an Rankine cycle engine, and up to $100,000 for outfitting six Oldsmobile Delmont 88s as operational patrol vehicles. This deal fell through because the Rankine engine manufacturers rejected the General Motors offer.

The plan was revised and two 1969 Dodge Polaras were to be retrofitted with steam engines for testing. One car was to be modified by Don Johnson of Thermodynamic Systems Inc. and the other by industrialist William P Lear's Lear Motors Incorporated. At the time, the California State Legislature was introducing strict pollution control regulations for automobiles and the Chair of the Assembly Transportation Committee, John Francis Foran, was supportive of the idea. The Committee also was proposing to test four steam-powered buses in the San Francisco Bay Area that year.

Instead of a Polara, Thermodynamic Systems (later called General Steam Corp), was given a late-model Oldsmobile Delmont 88. Lear was given a Polara but it does not appear to have been built. Both firms were given 6 months to complete their projects with Lear's being due for completion on 1 August 1969. Neither car had been completed by the due date and in November 1969, Lear was reported as saying the car would be ready in 3 months. Lear's only known retrofit was a Chevrolet Monte Carlo unrelated to the project. As for the project, it seems to have never been completed, with Lear pulling out by December.

In 1969, the National Air Pollution Control Administration announced a competition for a contract to design a practical passenger-car steam engine. Five firms entered. They were the consortium of Planning Research Corporation and STP Corporation; Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio; Continental Motors Corporation, Detroit; Vought Aeronautical Division of Ling-Temco-Vought, Dallas; and Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts.

General Motors introduced two experimental steam-powered cars in 1969. One was the SE 124 based on a converted Chevrolet Chevelle and the other was designated SE 101 based on the Pontiac Grand Prix. The SE 124 had its standard gasoline engine replaced with a 50 hp power Besler steam engine V4, using the 1920 Doble patents; the SE 101 was fitted with a 160 hp steam engine developed by GM Engineering. Power was transferred via a Toric automatic gearbox. The results was disappointing. The steam engine was heavy and weighted 300 kg more than a standard V8 and gave about half the power.

In October 1969, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology put out a challenge for a race August 1970 from Cambridge, Massachusetts to Pasadena, California for any college that wanted to participate in. The race was open for electric, steam, turbine power, and internal combustion engines: liquid-fueled, gaseous-fueled engines, and hybrids. Two steam-powered cars entered the race. University of California, San Diego's modified AMC Javelin and Worcester Polytechnic Institute's converted 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle called the tea kettle. Both dropped out on the second day of the race.

The California Assembly passed legislation in 1972 to contract two companies to develop steam-powered cars. They were Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company of Sacramento and Steam Power Systems of San Diego. Aerojet installed a steam turbine into a Chevrolet Vega, while Steam Power Systems built the Dutcher, a car named after the company's founder, Cornelius Dutcher. Both cars were tested by 1974 but neither car went into production. The Dutcher is on display at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles.

Modern steam cars
After disappearing from the market for decades, cars with this type of traction have reappeared in the prototype stage in the second half of the 20th century. The steam engine, in fact, if produced with modern technologies, has many characteristics that could make it valid as an alternative propulsion system.

Technological advances
The main novelty of contemporary steam engines, compared to those of the early twentieth century, is that of reducing the weight of the components that make up the propulsion system. Thanks to technological progress, it has indeed been possible to make the dimensions of the steam generator and of the condenser modest. This was achieved by drastically reducing the working fluid mass (water), increasing the heat exchange surface and improving the efficiency of the generator. Modern equipment makes it easy to regulate combustion and water supply. As a consequence, it is possible to obtain steam in very accurate operating conditions (in other words, it can be obtained at a very precise temperature and pressure). Instrument detection systems can also speed up the adaptation of the operating parameters to the optimal ones, which are also linked, inter alia, to driving conditions. With the advancement of technology, this type of engine is no longer affected by the problem of the time needed to start up, which has in fact become a few seconds.

The steam engine is technically much more free from the characteristics of the fuel used than it is to the internal combustion. The continuous combustion (not "to burst"), instrumentally controlled and conducted in an optimal manner, in addition to minimizing pollution, also allows the use of various environmentally friendly fuels with the current anti-pollution regulations (eg raw vegetable oils, alcohols, etc.) . In addition, compared to internal combustion engines, steam engines provide a higher yield and do not require, as already mentioned, a complex transmission. When the car is stationary, for example at a traffic light, the boiler operates in "stand-by" mode (ie in the conditions of maintaining temperature and steam pressure) and the engine is stationary; for this reason, the engine, unlike the internal combustion engine, consumes very little energy and produces no noise.

In fact, in modern steam engines, there is no longer a "boiler" in the common sense of the term: the steam generator consists of a series of evaporators consisting of very thin bundles of tubes, or other devices with a very high surface of exchange that contain very little water. The water and the steam are contained in a hermetically sealed circuit and therefore the minimum topping up of working fluid is not necessary. As with all closed circuits, the fluid used is a pure technical product, and although it is water, this is not common water, it is in fact purified, demineralized and degassed.

As the use of special materials has been widely used in modern steam engines, the use of conventional oil-based lubricants is rendered useless. Their lubricating function is in fact carried out in an excellent way by the working fluid itself, both in the form of water and in the form of steam . In the steam engine, mineral lubricating oil was in the past the main reason for damage, unreliability and malfunctions. In fact, after emulsifying with water and steam, it came into contact with the hot surfaces and carbonized quickly. The carbonaceous residues and the gelatinous emulsions deposited on the exchange surfaces damaged the transmission of heat, and clogged the condenser tubes, forcing them to continuous and costly maintenance interventions, ultimately making the management expensive and unreliable .

Indy Cars
Both Johnson and Lear had contemplated constructing steam-powered cars for the Indy 500, Johnson first in the early 1960s when with Controlled Steam Dynamics and in 1968 with Thermodynamic Systems and Lear in 1969. A third steam racing car was contemplated by a consortium of Planning Research Corporation and Andy Granatelli of STP Corporation. Lear proceeded with the idea and constructed a car, but ran out of funds while trying to develop the engine. The car is thought to be at the National Automobile and Truck Museum of the United States in Auburn, Indiana. Johnson was also noted as working on a steam-powered helicopter.

William D Thompson, 69-year-old retired San Diego automotive engineer, also announced he planned to enter a steam-powered race car. Thompson was working on a $35,000 steam-powered luxury car and he intended to use the car's engine in the race car. He had claimed that he had almost 250 orders for his cars. By comparison, Rolls Royces cost about $17,000 at that time.

Donald Healey
With Lear pulling out of attempting to make a steam car, Donald Healey decided to make a basic steam-car technology more in line with Stanley or Doble and aimed at enthusiasts. He planned to have the car in production by 1971.

Ted Pritchard Falcon
Edward Pritchard created a steam-powered 1963 model Ford Falcon in 1972. It was evaluated by the Australian Federal Government and was also taken to the United States for promotional purposes.

Saab steam car and Ranotor
As a result of the 1973 oil crisis, SAAB started a project in 1974 codenamed ULF (short for utan luftföroreningar, Swedish for Without Air Pollution)) headed by Dr. Ove Platell which made a prototype steam-powered car. The engine used an electronically controlled 28-pound multi-parallel-circuit steam generator with 1-millimeter-bore tubing and 16 gallons per hour firing rate which was intended to produce 160 hp (119 kW) of continuous power, and was about the same size as a standard car battery. Lengthy start-up times were avoided by using air compressed and stored when the car was running to power the car upon starting until adequate steam pressure was built up. The engine used a conical rotary valve made from pure boron nitride. To conserve water, a hermetically sealed water system was used.

Pelland Steamer
In 1974, the British designer Peter Pellandine produced the first Pelland Steamer for a contract with the South Australian Government. It had a fibreglass monocoque chassis (based on the internal combustion-engined Pelland Sports) and used a twin-cylinder double-acting compound engine. It has been preserved at the National Motor Museum at Birdwood, South Australia.

In 1977, the Pelland Mk II Steam Car was built, this time by Pelland Engineering in the UK. It had a three-cylinder double-acting engine in a 'broad-arrow' configuration, mounted in a tubular steel chassis with a Kevlar body, giving a gross weight of just 1,050 lb (476 kg). Uncomplicated and robust, the steam engine was claimed to give trouble-free, efficient performance. It had huge torque (1,100 ft⋅lbf or 1,500 N⋅m) at zero engine revs, and could accelerate from 0 to 60 mph (0 to 97 km/h) in under 8 seconds.

Pellandine made several attempts to break the land speed record for steam power, but was thwarted by technical issues.[specify] Pellandine moved back to Australia in the 1990s where he continued to develop the Steamer. The latest version is the Mark IV.

Enginion Steamcell
From 1996, a R&D subsidiary of the Volkswagen group called Enginion AG was developing a system called ZEE (Zero Emissions Engine). It produced steam almost instantly without an open flame, and took 30 seconds to reach maximum power from a cold start. Their third prototype, EZEE03, was a three-cylinder unit meant to fit in a Škoda Fabia automobile. The EZEE03 was described as having a "two-stroke" (i.e. single-acting) engine of 1,000 cc (61 cu in) displacement, producing up to 220 hp (164 kW) (500 N⋅m or 369 ft⋅lbf).[dead link] Exhaust emissions were said to be far below the SULEV standard. It had an oilless engine with ceramic cylinder linings using steam instead of oil as a lubricant. However, Enginion found that the market was not ready for steam cars, so they opted instead to develop the Steamcell power generator/heating system based on similar technology.


The prototypes produced
Following the energy crisis of 1973, Saab developed a project - started the following year under the guidance of Ove Platell - which was aimed at the construction of a steam engine . A prototype was built that had a boiler consisting of a multi-parallel circuit of thin tubes with an internal diameter of about one millimeter. This steam generator produced a power of 250 hp and was the size of an automobile battery . In order to allow the prototype to start immediately, an auxiliary compressed air propulsion system was provided. The steam engine of this vehicle was equipped with nine cylinders.

Between 1973 and 1974 the British designer Peter Pellandine produced in Australia - with the Pellandini Cars brand - his first steam engine. The project was the result of a contract with the Government of Southern Australia. The chassis and the monocoque of the vehicle were made of fiberglass, while the mechanics were based on that of the Morris 1100 and the Mini. In 1977 Pellandine, after returning home, built a second steam engine, the Pelland Mark II Steam Car, this time with the Pelland Engineering brand. The engine of this last prototype, which had a W configuration, was a double-acting three-cylinder.

In the nineties of the twentieth century, a subsidiary of the Volkswagen group operating in the field of research and development, Enginion AG, designed and built a steam engine called "ZEE" (acronym for "Zero Emissions Engine", ie "zero emissions engine" "), which produced 220 hp of power . This engine delivered steam almost instantaneously without the use of free flame and did not need lubricating oils, since the steam itself was used for this purpose . The cylinder liners were made of ceramic material. This engine was also characterized by very low pollutant emissions and a higher efficiency than the common internal combustion engines. However, Enginion AG realized that the market was not ready for steam engines, and preferred to proceed with the development of the "Steamcell" engine, ie an energy and heat generator (cogeneration) based on a similar principle. ]. In fact, the company could not convince any company to mass produce its own steam engine.

At the beginning of the 21st century, Harry Schoell experimented with the Cyclone steam engine. This engine, which is able to start from cold in about ten seconds and reach full speed in about one minute, is characterized by particularly low polluting emissions. The Cyclone engine, which was produced within the "Cyclone Power Technologies", has a yield of 46% and has a centrifugal combustion chamber, hence the name .

On August 25, 2009 the British Steam Car Challenge beat the land speed record valid for steam vehicles. This record lasted since 1906 when it was registered, as already mentioned, by Stanley Rocket. The new record, which was 225.055 km / h, was built at Edwards Air Force Base, in the Mojave desert, California . The car was driven by Charles Burnett III. Given that these earth speed primates are based on the average of two passes traveled in opposite directions over a time period of one hour, the maximum speed reached and recorded in the mentioned record was obtained considering the 219,037 km / h of the first pass and the 243,148 km / h of the second. On the same day, the record was confirmed by the FIA. The following day, Don Wales, nephew of Malcolm Campbell, made a new attempt with the same car reaching a record average speed of 238.679 km / h. The record was again beaten along two consecutive departures calculated, this time, over a distance of one kilometer. This record was also recorded by the FIA.

Source from Wikipedia

Propane

Propane is a three-carbon alkane with the molecular formula C3H8. It is a gas at standard temperature and pressure, but compressible to a transportable liquid. A by-product of natural gas processing and petroleum refining, it is commonly used as a fuel. Propane is one of a group of liquefied petroleum gases (LP gases). The others include butane, propylene, butadiene, butylene, isobutylene, and mixtures thereof.
Properties
Chemical formulaC3H8
Molar mass44.10 g·mol−1
AppearanceColorless gas
OdorOdorless
Density2.0098 kg/m3 (at 0 °C, 101.3 kPa)
Melting point−187.7 °C; −305.8 °F; 85.5 K
Boiling point−42.25 to −42.04 °C; −44.05 to −43.67 °F; 230.90 to 231.11 K
Solubility in water47mgL−1 (at 0 °C)
log P2.236
Vapor pressure853.16 kPa (at 21.1 °C (70.0 °F))
Henry's law
constant (kH)
15 nmol Pa−1 kg−1
Conjugate acidPropanium
Magnetic susceptibility (χ)-40.5·10−6 cm3/mol
Thermochemistry
Heat capacity (C)73.60 J K−1 mol−1
Std enthalpy of
formation(ΔfHo298)
−105.2–−104.2 kJ mol−1
Std enthalpy of
combustion(ΔcHo298)
−2.2197–−2.2187 MJ mol−1
Hazards
Safety data sheet 
GHS pictogramsThe flame pictogram in the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)
GHS signal wordDANGER
GHS hazard statementsH220
GHS precautionary statementsP210
Flash point−104 °C (−155 °F; 169 K)
Autoignition
temperature
470 °C (878 °F; 743 K)
Explosive limits2.37–9.5%
US health exposure limits (NIOSH):
PEL(Permissible)TWA 1000 ppm (1800 mg/m3)
REL(Recommended)TWA 1000 ppm (1800 mg/m3)
IDLH(Immediate danger)2100 ppm

History
Propane was discovered by the French chemist Marcellin Berthelot in 1857. It was first identified as a volatile component in gasoline by Walter O. Snelling of the U.S. Bureau of Mines in 1910. Although the compound was known long before this, Snelling's work was the beginning of the propane industry in the United States. The volatility of these lighter hydrocarbons caused them to be known as "wild" because of the high vapor pressures of unrefined gasoline. On March 31, 1912, The New York Times reported on Snelling's work with liquefied gas, saying "a steel bottle will carry enough gas to light an ordinary home for three weeks".

It was during this time that Snelling, in cooperation with Frank P. Peterson, Chester Kerr, and Arthur Kerr, created ways to liquefy the LP gases during the refining of natural gasoline. Together, they established American Gasol Co., the first commercial marketer of propane. Snelling had produced relatively pure propane by 1911, and on March 25, 1913, his method of processing and producing LP gases was issued patent #1,056,845. A separate method of producing LP gas through compression was created by Frank Peterson and its patent granted on July 2, 1912.

The 1920s saw increased production of LP gas, with the first year of recorded production totaling 223,000 US gallons (840 m3) in 1922. In 1927, annual marketed LP gas production reached 1 million US gallons (3,800 m3), and by 1935, the annual sales of LP gas had reached 56 million US gallons (210,000 m3). Major industry developments in the 1930s included the introduction of railroad tank car transport, gas odorization, and the construction of local bottle-filling plants. The year 1945 marked the first year that annual LP gas sales reached a billion gallons. By 1947, 62% of all U.S. homes had been equipped with either natural gas or propane for cooking.

In 1950, 1,000 propane-fueled buses were ordered by the Chicago Transit Authority, and by 1958, sales in the U.S. had reached 7 billion US gallons (26,000,000 m3) annually. In 2004, it was reported to be a growing $8-billion to $10-billion industry with over 15 billion US gallons (57,000,000 m3) of propane being used annually in the U.S.

The "prop-" root found in "propane" and names of other compounds with three-carbon chains was derived from "propionic acid", which in turn was named after the Greek words protos (meaning first) and pion (fat).

Sources
Propane is produced as a by-product of two other processes, natural gas processing and petroleum refining. The processing of natural gas involves removal of butane, propane, and large amounts of ethane from the raw gas, in order to prevent condensation of these volatiles in natural gas pipelines. Additionally, oil refineries produce some propane as a by-product of cracking petroleum into gasoline or heating oil.

The supply of propane cannot easily be adjusted to meet increased demand, because of the by-product nature of propane production. About 90% of U.S. propane is domestically produced. The United States imports about 10% of the propane consumed each year, with about 70% of that coming from Canada via pipeline and rail. The remaining 30% of imported propane comes to the United States from other sources via ocean transport.

After it is separated from the crude oil, North American propane is stored in huge salt caverns. Examples of these are Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta; Mont Belvieu, Texas; and Conway, Kansas. These salt caverns were hollowed out in the 1940s, and they can store 80,000,000 barrels (13,000,000 m3) or more of propane. When the propane is needed, much of it is shipped by pipelines to other areas of the United States. The North American standard grade of automotive use propane is rated HD 5. HD 5 grade has a maximum of 5 percent butane, but propane sold in Europe, has a max allowable amount of butane of 30 percent, meaning it's not the same fuel as HD 5. The LPG used as auto fuel and cooking gas in Asia and Australia, also has a very high content of butane. Propane is also shipped by truck, ship, barge, and railway to many U.S. areas.

Propane can also be produced as a biofuel.

Properties and reactions
Propane undergoes combustion reactions in a similar fashion to other alkanes. In the presence of excess oxygen, propane burns to form water and carbon dioxide.


When not enough oxygen or too much oxygen is present for complete combustion, incomplete combustion occurs, allowing carbon monoxide and/or soot (carbon) to be formed as well:


Complete combustion of propane produces about 50 MJ/kg of heat.
Propane combustion is much cleaner than unleaded gasoline combustion, and cleaner than natural gas combustion, because of the extremely high hydrogen content in propane. Propane burns hotter than home heating oil or diesel fuel because of the very high hydrogen content. Natural gas, known as methane shipped to your home or office, doesn't have the high hydrogen content of propane as used in North America. The presence of C–C bonds, plus the multiple bonds of propylene and butylene, create organic exhausts besides carbon dioxide and water vapor during typical combustion. These bonds also cause propane to burn with a visible flame.

Energy content
The enthalpy of combustion of propane gas where all products return to standard state, for example where water returns to its liquid state at standard temperature (known as higher heating value), is (2219.2 ± 0.5) kJ/mol, or (50.33 ± 0.01) MJ/kg. The enthalpy of combustion of propane gas where products do not return to standard state, for example where the hot gases including water vapor exit a chimney, (known as lower heating value) is −2043.455 kJ/mol. The lower heat value is the amount of heat available from burning the substance where the combustion products are vented to the atmosphere. For example, the heat from a fireplace when the flue is open. Propane used in North America as auto fuel and forklift uses, is rated as HD 5 grade and it has an octane rating of 104.5 R+M. The R means Research octane and the M means Motor octane. Both the R+M must be added together to get the average of those two different lab tests. EG: Methanol is 99 octane while ethanol is 99.5 octane, as a comparison, CNG natural gas is rated at 120 octane, so run your engines with 15 to one compression ratios and have fun.

Density
The density of liquid propane at 25 °C (77 °F) is 0.493 g/cm3, which is equivalent to 4.11 pounds per U.S. liquid gallon or 493 g/L. Propane expands at 1.5% per 10 °F. Thus, liquid propane has a density of approximately 4.2 pounds per gallon (504 g/L) at 60 °F (15.6 °C).

Uses
Propane is a popular choice for barbecues and portable stoves because the low boiling point of −42 °C (−44 °F) makes it vaporize as soon as it is released from its pressurized container. Therefore, no carburetor or other vaporizing device is required; a simple metering nozzle suffices. Propane powers some locomotive diesel engines as a fuel added into the turbocharger to give much better combustion, buses, forklifts, taxis, outboard boat motors, and ice resurfacing machines and is used for heat and cooking in recreational vehicles and campers.

Since it can be transported easily, it is a popular fuel for home heat and backup electrical generation in sparsely populated areas that do not have natural gas pipelines. Many heavy duty highway trucks use propane as a boost, where it is added through the turbocharger, to mix with the diesel fuel droplets. The very high hydrogen content of the propane droplets, helps the diesel fuel to burn hotter and therefore more complete. This means more torque, more horsepower and cleaner exhaust. It is normal for a 7 liter medium duty diesel truck engine to increase fuel mileage by 20 to 33 percent when they use a propane boost system. It's cheaper because propane is much cheaper than diesel fuel. The longer distance a cross country trucker can travel on a full load of fuel, combined diesel and propane, means he can keep within his federal hours of work rules with two fewer fuel stops across the country.

Truckers, tractor pulling competitions and farmers have been using a propane boost system for over 40 years in North America. International ships can use propane fumes that evaporate from ocean going ships that transport LPG, because as the sun warms up the propane during the voyage, they catch the evaporating propane gas and feed it into the air intake system of the ships diesel engines. This reduces bunker fuel consumption and helps the exhaust fumes to put out less pollution. This is very critical for the 2020 year as there is an international agreement to use either propane or CNG natural gas to be a mandatory additive to the bunker fuel ( very heavy oil ) for all ships traveling the oceans starting in 2020.

A 20 lb (9.1 kg) steel propane cylinder. This cylinder is fitted with an overfill prevention device (OPD) valve, as evidenced by the trilobular handwheel.
Propane is generally stored and transported in steel cylinders as a liquid with a vapor space above the liquid. The vapor pressure in the cylinder is a function of temperature. When gaseous propane is drawn at a high rate, the latent heat of vaporisation required to create the gas will cause the bottle to cool. (This is why water often condenses on the sides of the bottle and then freezes). In addition, the lightweight, high-octane compounds vaporize before the heavier, low-octane ones. Thus, the ignition properties change as the cylinder empties. For these reasons, the liquid is often withdrawn using a dip tube. Propane is used as fuel in furnaces for heat, in cooking, as an energy source for water heaters, laundry dryers, barbecues, portable stoves, and motor vehicles.

Commercially available "propane" fuel, or LPG, is not pure. Typically in the United States and Canada, it is primarily propane (at least 90%), with the rest mostly ethane, propylene, butane, and odorants including ethyl mercaptan. This is the HD-5 standard, (Heavy Duty-5% maximum allowable propylene content, and no more than 5% butanes and ethane) defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials by its Standard 1835 for internal combustion engines. Not all products labeled "LPG" conform to this standard however. In Mexico, for example, gas labeled "LPG" may consist of 60% propane and 40% butane. "The exact proportion of this combination varies by country, depending on international prices, on the availability of components and, especially, on the climatic conditions that favor LPG with higher butane content in warmer regions and propane in cold areas".

Domestic and industrial fuel
Propane use is growing rapidly in non-industrialized areas of the world. Propane has replaced many older other traditional fuel sources.

North American industries using propane include glass makers, brick kilns, poultry farms and other industries that need portable heat.

In rural areas of North America, as well as northern Australia, propane is used to heat livestock facilities, in grain dryers, and other heat-producing appliances. When used for heating or grain drying it is usually stored in a large, permanently-placed cylinder which is recharged by a propane-delivery truck. As of 2014, 6.2 million American households use propane as their primary heating fuel.

In North America, local delivery trucks with an average cylinder size of 3,000 US gallons (11,000 L), fill up large cylinders that are permanently installed on the property, or other service trucks exchange empty cylinders of propane with filled cylinders. Large tractor-trailer trucks, with an average cylinder size of 10,000 US gallons (38,000 L), transport the propane from the pipeline or refinery to the local bulk plant. The bobtail and transport are not unique to the North American market, though the practice is not as common elsewhere, and the vehicles are generally called tankers. In many countries, propane is delivered to consumers via small or medium-sized individual cylinders, while empty cylinders are removed for refilling at a central location.

Propene (also called propylene) can be a contaminant of commercial propane. Propane containing too much propene is not suited for most vehicle fuels. HD-5 is a specification that establishes a maximum concentration of 5% propene in propane. Propane and other LP gas specifications are established in ASTM D-1835. All propane fuels include an odorant, almost always ethanethiol, so that people can easily smell the gas in case of a leak. Propane as HD-5 was originally intended for use as vehicle fuel. HD-5 is currently being used in all propane applications.

Refrigeration
Propane is also instrumental in providing off-the-grid refrigeration, as the energy source for a gas absorption refrigerator and is commonly used for camping and recreational vehicles. In addition, blends of pure, dry "isopropane" (R-290a) (isobutane/propane mixtures) and isobutane (R-600a) can be used as the circulating refrigerant in suitably constructed compressor-based refrigeration. Compared to fluorocarbons, propane has a negligible ozone depletion potential and very low global warming potential (having a value of only 3.3 times the GWP of carbon dioxide) and can serve as a functional replacement for R-12, R-22, R-134a, and other chlorofluorocarbon or hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants in conventional stationary refrigeration and air conditioning systems. Because its global warming effect is far less than current refrigerants, propane was chosen as one of five replacement refrigerants approved by the EPA in 2015, for use in systems specially designed to handle its flammability.

In motor vehicles
Such substitution is widely prohibited or discouraged in motor vehicle air conditioning systems, on the grounds that using flammable hydrocarbons in systems originally designed to carry non-flammable refrigerant presents a significant risk of fire or explosion.

Vendors and advocates of hydrocarbon refrigerants argue against such bans on the grounds that there have been very few such incidents relative to the number of vehicle air conditioning systems filled with hydrocarbons.

Motor fuel
Propane is also being used increasingly for vehicle fuels. In the U.S., over 190,000 on-road vehicles use propane, and over 450,000 forklifts use it for power. It is the third most popular vehicle fuel in the world, behind gasoline and Diesel fuel. In other parts of the world, propane used in vehicles is known as autogas. In 2007, approximately 13 million vehicles worldwide use autogas.

The advantage of propane in cars is its liquid state at a moderate pressure. This allows fast refill times, affordable fuel cylinder construction, and price ranges typically just over half that of gasoline. Meanwhile, it is noticeably cleaner (both in handling, and in combustion), results in less engine wear (due to carbon deposits) without diluting engine oil (often extending oil-change intervals), and until recently was a relative bargain in North America. The octane rating of propane is relatively high at 110. In the United States the propane fueling infrastructure is the most developed of all alternative vehicle fuels. Many converted vehicles have provisions for topping off from "barbecue bottles". Purpose-built vehicles are often in commercially owned fleets, and have private fueling facilities. A further saving for propane fuel vehicle operators, especially in fleets, is that pilferage is much more difficult than with gasoline or diesel fuels.

Propane is also used as fuel for small engines, especially those used indoors or in areas with insufficient fresh air and ventilation to carry away the more toxic exhaust of an engine running on gasoline or Diesel fuel. More recently, there have been lawn care products like string trimmers, lawn mowers and leaf blowers intended for outdoor use, but fueled by propane in order to reduce air pollution.

Improvised explosive devices
Propane and propane cylinders have been used as improvised explosive devices in attacks and attempted attacks against schools and terrorist targets such as the Columbine High School massacre, 2012 Brindisi school bombing, the Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis and in car bombs.

Other uses
Propane is the primary flammable gas in blowtorches for soldering.
Propane is used as a feedstock for the production of base petrochemicals in steam cracking.
Propane is the primary fuel for hot air balloons.
It is used in semiconductor manufacture to deposit silicon carbide.
Propane is commonly used in theme parks and in the movie industry as an inexpensive, high-energy fuel for explosions and other special effects.
Propane is used as a propellant, relying on the expansion of the gas to fire the projectile. It does not ignite the gas. The use of a liquefied gas gives more shots per cylinder, compared to a compressed gas.
Propane is used as a propellant for many household aerosol sprays, including shaving creams and air fresheners.
Propane is a promising feedstock for the production of propylene and acrylic acid.
Hazards
Propane is a simple asphyxiant. Unlike natural gas, propane is denser than air. It may accumulate in low spaces and near the floor. When abused as an inhalant, it may cause hypoxia (lack of oxygen), pneumonia, cardiac failure or cardiac arrest. Propane has low toxicity since it is not readily absorbed and is not biologically active. Commonly stored under pressure at room temperature, propane and its mixtures will flash evaporate at atmospheric pressure and cool well below the freezing point of water. The cold gas, which appears white due to moisture condensing from the air, may cause frostbite.

Propane is denser than air. If a leak in a propane fuel system occurs, the gas will have a tendency to sink into any enclosed area and thus poses a risk of explosion and fire. The typical scenario is a leaking cylinder stored in a basement; the propane leak drifts across the floor to the pilot light on the furnace or water heater, and results in an explosion or fire. This property makes propane generally unsuitable as a fuel for boats.

One hazard associated with propane storage and transport is known as a BLEVE or boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion. The Kingman Explosion involved a railroad tank car in Kingman, Arizona in 1973 during a propane transfer. The fire and subsequent explosions resulted in twelve fatalities and numerous injuries.

Comparison with natural gas
Propane is bought and stored in a liquid form (LPG), and thus fuel energy can be stored in a relatively small space. Compressed natural gas (CNG), largely methane, is another gas used as fuel, but it cannot be liquefied by compression at normal temperatures, as these are well above its critical temperature. As a gas, very high pressure is required to store useful quantities. This poses the hazard that, in an accident, just as with any compressed gas cylinder (such as a CO2 cylinder used for a soda concession) a CNG cylinder may burst with great force, or leak rapidly enough to become a self-propelled missile. Therefore, CNG is much less efficient to store, due to the large cylinder volume required. An alternative means of storing natural gas is as a cryogenic liquid in an insulated container as liquefied natural gas (LNG). This form of storage is at low pressure and is around 3.5 times as efficient as storing it as CNG. Unlike propane, if a spill occurs, CNG will evaporate and dissipate harmlessly because it is lighter than air. Propane is much more commonly used to fuel vehicles than is natural gas, because the equipment required costs less. Propane requires just 1,220 kilopascals (177 psi) of pressure to keep it liquid at 37.8 °C (100 °F).

Retail cost

United States
As of October 2013, the retail cost of propane was approximately $2.37 per gallon, or roughly $25.95 per 1 million BTUs. This means that filling a 500-gallon propane tank, which is what households that use propane as their main source of energy usually require, costs $948 (80% of 500 gallons or 400 gallons), a 7.5% increase on the 2012–2013 winter season average US price. However, propane costs per gallon change significantly from one state to another: the Energy Information Administration (EIA) quotes a $2.995 per gallon average on the East Coast for October 2013, while the figure for the Midwest was $1.860 for the same period.

As of December 2015 the propane retail cost was approximately $1.97 per gallon. This means that filling a 500-gallon propane tank to 80% capacity costs $788, a 16.9% decrease or $160 less from the November 2013 quote in this section. Similar regional differences in prices are present with the December 2015 EIA figure for the East Coast at $2.67 per gallon and the Midwest at $1.43 per gallon.

As of August 2018 the average US propane retail cost was approximately $2.48 per gallon. The wholesale price of propane in the U.S. always drops in the summer as most homes don't require it for home heating. The wholesale price of propane in the summer of 2018 has been between 86 cents to 96 cents per U.S. gallon, based on a truckload or railway car load. The daily propane prices are posted at the website Barrons dot com under market Data and under Cash Prices every day about 9 pm for that day's propane wholesale trade. The price for home heating is exactly double that price, so at 95 cents per gallon wholesale, that would mean a home delivered price of $1.90 per gallon if you order 500 gallons at a time. Prices in the midwest are always cheaper than California. Prices for home delivery always go up near the end of August or the first few days of September when people start ordering their home tanks to be filled.

Source from Wikipedia

Natural gas vehicle

A natural gas vehicle (NGV) is an alternative fuel vehicle that uses compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied natural gas (LNG). Natural gas vehicles should not be confused with vehicles powered by LPG (mainly propane), which is a fuel with a fundamentally different composition.

In a natural gas powered vehicle, energy is released by combustion of essentially Methane gas (CH4) fuel with Oxygen (O2) from the air to CO2 and water vapor (H2O) in an internal combustion engine. Methane is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon and many contaminants present in natural gas are removed at source.

Safe, convenient and cost effective gas storage and fuelling is more of a challenge compared to petrol and diesel vehicles since the natural gas is pressurized and/or - in the case of LNG - the tank needs to be kept cold. This makes LNG unsuited for vehicles that are not in frequent use. The lower energy density of gases compared to liquid fuels is mitigated to a great extent by high compression or gas liquefaction, but requires a trade-off in terms of size/complexity/weight of the storage container, range of the vehicle between refueling stops, and time to refuel.

Although similar storage technologies may be used for and similar compromises would apply to a hydrogen vehicle as part of a proposed new hydrogen economy, methane as a gaseous fuel is safer than hydrogen due to its lower flammability, low corrosivity and better leak tightness due to larger molecular weight/ size, resulting in lower price hardware solutions based on proven technology and conversions. A key advantage of using natural gas is the existence, in principle, of most of the infrastructure and the supply chain, which is non-interchangeable with hydrogen. Methane today mostly comes from non-renewable sources but can be supplied or produced from renewable sources, offering net carbon neutral mobility. In many markets, especially the Americas, natural gas may trade at a discount to other fossil fuel products such as petrol, diesel or coal, or indeed be a less valuable by-product associated with their production that has to be disposed. Many countries also provide tax incentives for natural gas powered vehicles due to the environmental benefits to society. Lower operating costs and government incentives to reduce pollution from heavy vehicles in urban areas have driven the adoption of NGV for commercial and public uses, i.e. trucks and buses.

Many factors hold back NGV popularization for individual mobility applications, i.e. private vehicles, including: relatively price and environmentally insensitive but convenience seeking private individuals; good profits and taxes extractable from small batch sales of value-added, branded petrol and diesel fuels via established trade channels and oil refiners; resistance and safety concerns to increasing gas inventories in urban areas; dual-use of utility distribution networks originally built for home gas supply and allocation of network expansion costs; reluctance, effort and costs associated with switching; prestige and nostalgia associated with petroleum vehicles; fear of redundancy and disruption. A particular challenge may be the fact that refiners are currently set up to produce a certain fuels mix from crude oil. Aviation fuel is likely to remain the fuel of choice for aircraft due to their weight sensitivity for the foreseeable future.

Worldwide, there were 24.452 million NGVs by 2016, led by China (5.0 million), Iran (4.00 million), India (3.045 million), Pakistan (3.0 million), Argentina (2.295 million), Brazil (1.781 million), and Italy (1.001 million). The Asia-Pacific region leads the world with 6.8 million vehicles, followed by Latin America with 4.2 million. In Latin America, almost 90% of NGVs have bi-fuel engines, allowing these vehicles to run on either gasoline or CNG. In Pakistan, almost every vehicle converted to (or manufactured for) alternative fuel use typically retains the capability of running on gasoline.

As of 2016, the U.S. had a fleet of 160,000 NG vehicles, including 3,176 LNG vehicles. Other countries where natural gas-powered buses are popular include India, Australia, Argentina, Germany, and Greece. In OECD countries, there are around 500,000 CNG vehicles. Pakistan's market share of NGVs was 61.1% in 2010, follow by Armenia with more than 77% (2014), and Bolivia with 20%. The number of NGV refueling stations has also increased, to 18,202 worldwide as of 2010, up 10.2% from the previous year.

Existing gasoline-powered vehicles may be converted to run on CNG or LNG, and can be dedicated (running only on natural gas) or bi-fuel (running on either gasoline or natural gas). Diesel engines for heavy trucks and busses can also be converted and can be dedicated with the addition of new heads containing spark ignition systems, or can be run on a blend of diesel and natural gas, with the primary fuel being natural gas and a small amount of diesel fuel being used as an ignition source. It is also possible to generate energy in a small gas turbine and couple the gas engine or turbine with a small electric battery to create a hybrid electric motor driven vehicle. An increasing number of vehicles worldwide are being manufactured to run on CNG by major carmakers. Until recently, the Honda Civic GX was the only NGV commercially available in the US market. More recently, Ford, General Motors and Ram Trucks have bi-fuel offerings in their vehicle lineup. In 2006, the Brazilian subsidiary of FIAT introduced the Fiat Siena Tetra fuel, a four-fuel car that can run on natural gas (CNG).

NGV filling stations can be located anywhere that natural gas lines exist. Compressors (CNG) or liquifaction plants (LNG) are usually built on large scale but with CNG small home refueling stations are possible. A company called FuelMaker pioneered such a system called Phill Home Refueling Appliance (known as "Phill"), which they developed in partnership with Honda for the American GX model. Phill is now manufactured and sold by BRC FuelMaker, a division of Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.

CNG may be generated and used for bulk storage and pipeline transport of renewable energy and also be mixed with biomethane, itself derived from biogas from landfills or anaerobic digestion. This would allow the use of CNG for mobility without increasing the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere. It would also allow continued use of CNG vehicles currently powered by non-renewable fossil fuels that do not become obsolete when stricter CO2 emissions regulations are mandated to combat global warming.

Despite its advantages, the use of natural gas vehicles faces several limitations, including fuel storage and infrastructure available for delivery and distribution at fueling stations. CNG must be stored in high pressure cylinders (3000psi to 3600psi operation pressure), and LNG must be stored in cryogenic cylinders (-260F to -200F). These cylinders take up more space than gasoline or diesel tanks that can be molded in intricate shapes to store more fuel and use less on-vehicle space. CNG tanks are usually located in the vehicle's trunk or pickup bed, reducing the space available for other cargo. This problem can be solved by installing the tanks under the body of the vehicle, or on the roof (typical for busses), leaving cargo areas free. As with other alternative fuels, other barriers for widespread use of NGVs are natural gas distribution to and at fueling stations as well as the low number of CNG and LNG stations.

CNG-powered vehicles are considered to be safer than gasoline-powered vehicles.

CNG/LNG as fuel for automobiles

Available production cars
Existing gasoline-powered vehicles may be converted to run on CNG or LNG, and can be dedicated (running only on natural gas) or bi-fuel (running on either gasoline or natural gas). However, an increasing number of vehicles worldwide are being manufactured to run on CNG. Until recently, the now-discontinued Honda Civic GX was the only NGV commercially available in the US market. More recently, Ford, General Motors and Ram Trucks have bi-fuel offerings in their vehicle lineup. Ford's approach is to offer a bi-fuel prep kit as a factory option, and then have the customer choose an authorized partner to install the natural gas equipment. Choosing GM's bi-fuel option sends the HD pickups with the 6.0L gasoline engine to IMPCO in Indiana to upfit the vehicle to run on CNG. Ram currently is the only pickup truck manufacturer with a truly CNG factory-installed bi-fuel system available in the U.S. market.

Outside the U.S. GM do Brasil introduced the MultiPower engine in 2004, which was capable of using CNG, alcohol and gasoline (E20-E25 blend) as fuel, and it was used in the Chevrolet Astra 2.0 model 2005, aimed at the taxi market. In 2006, the Brazilian subsidiary of FIAT introduced the Fiat Siena Tetra fuel, a four-fuel car developed under Magneti Marelli of Fiat Brazil. This automobile can run on natural gas (CNG); 100% ethanol (E100); E20 to E25 gasoline blend, Brazil's mandatory gasoline; and pure gasoline, though no longer available in Brazil it is used in neighboring countries.

In 2015, Honda announced its decision to phase out the commercialization of natural-gas powered vehicles to focus on the development of a new generation of electrified vehicles such as hybrids, plug-in electric cars and hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles. Since 2008, Honda sold about 16,000 natural-gas vehicles, mainly to taxi and commercial fleets.

Differences between LNG and CNG fuels
Though LNG and CNG are both considered NGVs, the technologies are vastly different. Refueling equipment, fuel cost, pumps, tanks, hazards, capital costs are all different.

One thing they share is that due to engines made for gasoline, computer controlled valves to control fuel mixtures are required for both of them, often being proprietary and specific to the manufacturer. The on-engine technology for fuel metering is the same for LNG and CNG.

CNG as an auto fuel
CNG, or compressed natural gas, is stored at high pressure, 3,000 to 3,600 pounds per square inch (21 to 25 MPa). The required tank is more massive and costly than a conventional fuel tank. Commercial on-demand refueling stations are more expensive to operate than LNG stations because of the energy required for compression, the compressor requires 100 times more electrical power, however, slow-fill (many hours) can be cost-effective with LNG stations [missing citation - the initial liquefaction of natural gas by cooling requires more energy than gas compression]. Time to fill a CNG tank varies greatly depending on the station. Home refuelers typically fill at about 0.4 GGE/hr. "Fast-fill" stations may be able to refill a 10 GGE tank in 5–10 minutes. Also, because of the lower energy density, the range on CNG is limited by comparison to LNG. Gas composition and throughput allowing, it should be feasible to connect commercial CNG fueling stations to city gas networks, or enable home fueling of CNG vehicles directly using a gas compressor. Similar to a car battery, the CNG tank of a car could double as a home energy storage device and the compressor could be powered at times when there is excess/ free renewable electrical energy.

LNG as an auto fuel
LNG, or liquified natural gas, is natural gas that has been cooled to a point that it is a cryogenic liquid. In its liquid state, it is still more than 2 times as dense as CNG. LNG is usually dispensed from bulk storage tanks at LNG fuel stations at rates exceeding 20 DGE/min. Sometimes LNG is made locally from utility pipe. Because of its cryogenic nature, it is stored in specially designed insulated tanks. Generally speaking, these tanks operate at fairly low pressures (about 70-150 psi) when compared to CNG. A vaporizer is mounted in the fuel system that turns the LNG into a gas (which may simply be considered low pressure CNG). When comparing building a commercial LNG station with a CNG station, utility infrastructure, capital cost, and electricity heavily favor LNG over CNG. There are existing LCNG stations (both CNG and LNG), where fuel is stored as LNG, then vaporized to CNG on-demand. LCNG stations require less capital cost than fast-fill CNG stations alone, but more than LNG stations.

Advantages over gasoline and diesel
LNG – and especially CNG – tends to corrode and wear the parts of an engine less rapidly than gasoline. Thus it is quite common to find diesel-engine NGVs with high mileages (over 500,000 miles). CNG also emits 20-29% less CO2 than diesel and gasoline. Emissions are cleaner, with lower emissions of carbon and lower particulate emissions per equivalent distance traveled. There is generally less wasted fuel. However, cost (monetary, environmental, pre-existing infrastructure) of distribution, compression, cooling must be taken into account.

Inherent advantages/disadvantages between autogas (LPG) power and NGV
Autogas, also known as LPG, has different chemical composition, but still a petroleum based gas, has a number of inherent advantages and disadvantages, as well as noninherent ones. The inherent advantage of autogas over CNG is that it requires far less compression (20% of CNG cost), is denser as it is a liquid at room temperature, and thus requires far cheaper tanks (consumer) and fuel compressors (provider) than CNG. As compared to LNG, it requires no chilling (and thus less energy), or problems associated with extreme cold such as frostbite. Like NGV, it also has advantages over gasoline and diesel in cleaner emissions, along with less wear on engines over gasoline. The major drawback of LPG is its safety. The fuel is volatile and the fumes are heavier than air, which causes them to collect in a low spot in the event of a leak, making it far more hazardous to use and more care is needed in handling. Besides this, LPG (40% from Crude Oil refining) is more expensive than Natural Gas.

Current advantages of LPG power over NGV
In places like the US, Thailand, and India, there are five to ten times more stations thus making the fuel more accessible than NGV stations. Other countries like Poland, South Korea, and Turkey, LPG stations and autos are widespread while NGVs are not. In addition, in some countries such as Thailand, the retail LPG fuel is considerably cheaper in cost.

Future possibilities
Though ANG (adsorbed natural gas) has not yet been used in either providing stations nor consumer storage tanks, its low compression (500psi vs 3600 psi) has the potential to drive down costs of NGV infrastructure and vehicle tanks.

LNG fueled vehicles

Use of LNG to fuel large over-the-road trucks
LNG is being evaluated and tested for over-the-road trucking, off-road, marine, and railroad applications. There are known problems with the fuel tanks and delivery of gas to the engine.

China has been a leader in the use of LNG vehicles with over 100,000 LNG powered vehicles on the road as of 2014.

In the United States, there were 69 public truck LNG fuel centres as of February 2015. The 2013 National Trucker's Directory lists approximately 7,000 truckstops, thus approximately 1% of US truckstops have LNG available.

In 2013, Dillon Transport announced they were putting 25 LNG large trucks into service in Dallas Texas. They are refueling at a public LNG fuel center. The same year Raven Transportation announced they were buying 36 LNG large trucks to be fueled by Clean Energy Fuels locations and Lowe's finished converting one of its dedicated fleets to LNG fueled trucks.

UPS had over 1200 LNG fueled trucks on the roads in February 2015. UPS has 16,000 tractor trucks in its fleet, and 60 of the new for 2014 large trucks will be placed in service in the Houston, Texas area, where UPS is building its own private LNG fuel center to avoid the lines at retail fuel centers. In Amarillo, Texas and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, UPS is using public fuel centers.

Clean Energy Fuels has opened several public LNG Fuel Lanes along I-10 and claims that as of June 2014 LNG fueled trucks can use the route from Los Angeles, California to Houston, Texas by refueling exclusively at Clean Energy Fuels public facilities. In 2014 Shell and Travel Centers of America opened the first of a planned network of U.S. truck stop LNG stations in Ontario, California. Per the alternative fuel fuelling centre tracking site there are 10 LNG capable public fuel stations in the greater Los Angeles area, making it the single most penetrated metro market. As of February 2015, Blu LNG has at least 23 operational LNG capable fuel centers across 8 states, and Clean Energy had 39 operational public LNG facilities.

As can be seen at the alternative fuel fueling center tracking site, as of early 2015 there is void of LNG fuel centers, public and private, from Illinois to the Rockies. A Noble Energy LNG production plant in northern Colorado was planned to go online in 1st quarter 2015 and to have a capacity of 100,000 gallons of LNG per day for on-road, off-road, and drilling operations.

As of 2014, LNG fuel and NGV's had not achieved much usage in Europe.

American Gas & Technology pioneered use of onsite liquefaction using van sized station to access Natural Gas from utility pipe and clean, liquefy, store and dispense it. Their stations make 300-5,000 gallons of LNG per day.

Use of LNG to fuel high-horsepower/high-torque engines
In internal combustion engines the volume of the cylinders is a common measure of the power of an engine. Thus a 2000cc engine would typically be more powerful than an 1800cc engine, but that assumes a similar air-fuel mixture is used.

If, via a turbocharger as an example, the 1800cc engine were using an air-fuel mixture that was significantly more energy dense, then it might be able to produce more power than a 2000cc engine burning a less energy dense air-fuel mixture. However, turbochargers are both complex and expensive. Thus it becomes clear for high-horsepower/high-torque engines a fuel that can inherently be used to create a more energy dense air-fuel mixture is preferred because a smaller and simpler engine can be used to produce the same power.

With traditional gasoline and diesel engines the energy density of the air-fuel mixture is limited because the liquid fuels do not mix well in the cylinder. Further, gasoline and diesel auto-ignite at temperatures and pressures relevant to engine design. An important part of traditional engine design is designing the cylinders, compression ratios, and fuel injectors such that pre-ignition is avoided, but at the same time as much fuel as possible can be injected, become well mixed, and still have time to complete the combustion process during the power stroke.

Natural gas does not auto-ignite at pressures and temperatures relevant to traditional gasoline and diesel engine design, thus providing more flexibility in the design of a natural gas engine. Methane, the main component of natural gas, has an autoignition temperature of 580C/1076F, whereas gasoline and diesel autoignite at approximately 250C and 210C respectively.

With a compressed natural gas (CNG) engine, the mixing of the fuel and the air is more effective since gases typically mix well in a short period of time, but at typical CNG compression pressures the fuel itself is less energy dense than gasoline or diesel thus the end result is a lower energy dense air-fuel mixture. Thus for the same cylinder displacement engine, a non turbocharged CNG powered engine is typically less powerful than a similarly sized gasoline or diesel engine. For that reason, turbochargers are popular on European CNG cars. Despite that limitation, the 12 liter Cummins Westport ISX12G engine is an example of a CNG capable engine designed to pull tractor/trailer loads up to 80,000 lbs showing CNG can be used in most if not all on-road truck applications. The original ISX G engines incorporated a turbocharger to enhance the air-fuel energy density.

LNG offers a unique advantage over CNG for more demanding high-horsepower applications by eliminating the need for a turbocharger. Because LNG boils at approximately -160C, using a simple heat exchanger a small amount of LNG can be converted to its gaseous form at extremely high pressure with the use of little or no mechanical energy. A properly designed high-horsepower engine can leverage this extremely high pressure energy dense gaseous fuel source to create a higher energy density air-fuel mixture than can be efficiently created with a CNG powered engine. The end result when compared to CNG engines is more overall efficiency in high-horsepower engine applications when high-pressure direct injection technology is used. The Westport HDMI2 fuel system is an example of a high-pressure direct injection technology that does not require a turbocharger if teamed with appropriate LNG heat exchanger technology. The Volvo Trucks 13-liter LNG engine is another example of a LNG engine leveraging advanced high pressure technology.

Westport recommends CNG for engines 7 liters or smaller and LNG with direct injection for engines between 20 and 150 liters. For engines between 7 and 20 liters either option is recommended. See slide 13 from their NGV BRUXELLES – INDUSTRY INNOVATION SESSION presentation

High horsepower engines in the oil drilling, mining, locomotive, and marine fields have been or are being developed. Paul Blomerous has written a paper concluding as much as 40 million tonnes per annum of LNG (approximately 26.1 billion gallons/year or 71 million gallons/day) could be required just to meet the global needs of the high-horsepower engines by 2025 to 2030.

As of the end of 1st quarter 2015 Prometheus Energy Group Inc claims to have delivered over 100 million gallons of LNG within the previous 4 years into the industrial market, and is continuing to add new customers.

Ships
The MV Isla Bella is the world's first LNG powered container ship. LNG carriers are sometimes powered by the boil-off of LNG from their storage tanks, although Diesel powered LNG carriers are also common to minimize loss of cargo and enable more versatile refueling.

Aircraft
Some airplanes use LNG to power their turbofans. Aircraft are particularly sensitive to weight and much of the weight of an aircraft goes into fuel carriage to allow the range. The low energy density of natural gas even in liquid form compared to conventional fuels give it a distinct disadvantage for flight applications.

Chemical composition and energy content
Chemical composition
The primary component of natural gas is methane (CH4), the shortest and lightest hydrocarbon molecule. It may also contain heavier gaseous hydrocarbons such as ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10), as well as other gases, in varying amounts. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a common contaminant, which must be removed prior to most uses.

Energy content
Combustion of one cubic meter yields 38 MJ (10.6 kWh). Natural gas has the highest energy/carbon ratio of any fossil fuel, and thus produces less carbon dioxide per unit of energy.

Storage and transport
Transport
The major difficulty in the use of natural gas is transportation. Natural gas pipelines are economical and common on land and across medium-length stretches of water (like Langeled, Interconnector and Trans-Mediterranean Pipeline), but are impractical across large oceans. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker ships, railway tankers, and tank trucks are also used.

Storage
CNG is typically stored in steel or composite containers at high pressure (3000 to 4000 psi, or 205 to 275 bar). These containers are not typically temperature controlled, but are allowed to stay at local ambient temperature. There are many standards for CNG cylinders, the most popular one is ISO 11439. For North America the standard is ANSI NGV-2.

LNG storage pressures are typically around 50-150 psi, or 3 to 10 bar. At atmospheric pressure, LNG is at a temperature of -260 °F (-162 °C), however, in a vehicle tank under pressure the temperature is slightly higher (see saturated fluid). Storage temperatures may vary due to varying composition and storage pressure. LNG is far denser than even the highly compressed state of CNG. As a consequence of the low temperatures, vacuum insulated storage tanks typically made of stainless steel are used to hold LNG.

CNG can be stored at lower pressure in a form known as an ANG (Adsorbed Natural Gas) tank at 35 bar (500 psi, the pressure of gas in natural gas pipelines) in various sponge like materials, such as activated carbon and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). The fuel is stored at similar or greater energy density than CNG. This means that vehicles can be refuelled from the natural gas network without extra gas compression, the fuel tanks can be slimmed down and made of lighter, less strong materials.

Conversion kits
Conversion kits for gasoline or diesel to LNG/CNG are available in many countries, along with the labor to install them. However, the range of prices and quality of conversion vary enormously.

Recently, regulations involving certification of installations in USA have been loosened to include certified private companies, those same kit installations for CNG have fallen to the $6,000+ range (depending on type of vehicle).

Source from Wikipedia

Liquid nitrogen vehicles

A liquid nitrogen vehicle is powered by liquid nitrogen, which is stored in a tank. Traditional nitrogen engine designs work by heating the liquid nitrogen in a heat exchanger, extracting heat from the ambient air and using the resulting pressurized gas to operate a piston or rotary motor. Vehicles propelled by liquid nitrogen have been demonstrated, but are not used commercially. One such vehicle, Liquid Air was demonstrated in 1902.

Liquid nitrogen propulsion may also be incorporated in hybrid systems, e.g., battery electric propulsion and fuel tanks to recharge the batteries. This kind of system is called a hybrid liquid nitrogen-electric propulsion. Additionally, regenerative braking can also be used in conjunction with this system.

In June 2016 trials will begin in London, UK on supermarket J Sainsbury's fleet of food delivery vehicles: using a Dearman nitrogen engine to provide power for the cooling of food cargo when the vehicle is stationary and the main engine is off. Currently delivery lorries mostly have 2nd smaller diesel engines to power cooling when the main engine is off.

Description
Liquid nitrogen is generated by cryogenic or reversed Stirling engine coolers that liquefy the main component of air, nitrogen (N2). The cooler can be powered by electricity or through direct mechanical work from hydro or wind turbines. Liquid nitrogen is distributed and stored in insulated containers. The insulation reduces heat flow into the stored nitrogen; this is necessary because heat from the surrounding environment boils the liquid, which then transitions to a gaseous state. Reducing inflowing heat reduces the loss of liquid nitrogen in storage. The requirements of storage prevent the use of pipelines as a means of transport. Since long-distance pipelines would be costly due to the insulation requirements, it would be costly to use distant energy sources for production of liquid nitrogen. Petroleum reserves are typically a vast distance from consumption but can be transferred at ambient temperatures.

Liquid nitrogen consumption is in essence production in reverse. The Stirling engine or cryogenic heat engine offers a way to power vehicles and a means to generate electricity. Liquid nitrogen can also serve as a direct coolant for refrigerators, electrical equipment and air conditioning units. The consumption of liquid nitrogen is in effect boiling and returning the nitrogen to the atmosphere.

In the Dearman Engine the nitrogen is heated by combining it with the heat exchange fluid inside the cylinder of the engine.

Description and uses

Use in cryogenic
Currently liquid nitrogen is used in cryogenics, for example to cool superconducting magnets in nuclear magnetic resonance equipment, in the more sophisticated types of infrared sensor, in maglev maglev trains, in computer microchips that exploit the Josephson effect, and perhaps in the future in the superconducting magnets of the tokamak reactors, intended for nuclear fusion. It has also been proposed to use liquid nitrogen to cool superconductive ceramic sheets and thus to construct electric lines thousands of kilometers long, which would for example bring liquid nitrogen and electricity (without any resistance) for thousands of kilometers, from nuclear reactors in Arctic, up to northern cities such as Chicago or New York.

In medicine, direct use is made of cold in cryopreservation of cells such as spermatozoa and ova for artificial insemination or for in vitro fertilization. With the proliferation of pregnancies, the spread of cancer diseases that often require sterilizing therapies, and some fertilization techniques applied to women in their 60s, there is the possibility that many people may keep their gametes (or embryos) for decades, before starting pregnancy. Some people in Arizona, after death (or putting an end to their existence as suffering from incurable diseases), they have had their head or whole body frozen, with the remote hope, in a super-technological future, of being "thawed" with techniques futuristic, treated appropriately and subsequently revived and brought back to a new healthy life. You do not have the faintest idea if these attempts can succeed.

In the aerospace field, liquid nitrogen is used by NASA as a means to concentrate and store cold, safely, for long periods, which will be used (after the electrolysis of water) to bring the oxygen and water to the liquefaction temperature. hydrogen used in rocket propulsion like the Space Shuttle. An increase in the use of these fuels and / or of the oxidized oxygen comburent would inevitably lead to an increase in the consumption of liquid nitrogen. The use of liquid nitrogen in this role by NASA has already produced victims of asphyxiation,2, and since it is a completely odorless gas, the technicians who were next, suddenly breathed an atmosphere with a percentage oxygen content and absolute low (because at those temperatures a part of the oxygen condenses as liquid on the ground), comparable as absolute pressure of O 2 to that of the summit of Everest. 

In the slaughtering industry meat could be preserved, even for many years, this allows to keep the prices stable for many years (subtracting meat from the markets in periods of low consumption and putting it into the peaks) or to create strategic reserves to be used in the course of wars or catastrophes.

Use in environmental engineering
At the time of the Soviet Union, it was discovered that by spraying liquid nitrogen into the lower atmosphere, the mist could be precipitated by condensation or freezing of water vapor or microscopic droplets of mist water. This allowed, in windless days, to keep military airports open, creating a fog-free area around them.

Currently the same technique can be used to create areas of thinning fog, near airports, motorway junctions, or important monuments. As a deleterious effect there would be a slight drop in temperature in the immediate vicinity. In 1998, along the Trieste-Venice highway, the Russians demonstrated this procedure.

Other possible uses of liquid nitrogen concern the induction of rain (by spraying clouds with liquid nitrogen) or the deviation of hurricanes (by nebulizing it on marine areas), lowering the temperature and therefore the pressure, which would cause the disturbance to deviate towards the area of lower pressure, for example far from the mainland.

Use in transport
Currently, most road vehicles are propelled from the internal combustion engine that burns fossil fuel. If we assume that road transport must be sustainable in the very long term, current fuels must be replaced by something else that is produced by renewable energy. The substitute does not necessarily have to be a "tout court" energy source; but rather a means of transferring and concentrating energy, comparable to a sort of "energy currency".

Liquid nitrogen at low temperature, passing from a tube to a tube and expanding and absorbing the external heat of the environment into a ventilated grid, increases its pressure enormously and can move a turbine connected to an electric generator, which supplies electricity to electric motors that push the wheels. Various turbines put in series can develop current from the various temperature and pressure jumps, and finally, the emissions are made of low temperature nitrogen, 70% air component, and therefore the extent of the pollution is zero (even if it is not convenient to breathe directly from these cold exhaust pipes, because there is a risk of fainting and asphyxiation).

Currently, using similar principles, several prototypes of compressed air engines have been built, which in practice take heat from the surrounding environment and transform it into kinetic energy. These engines often get stuck due to excessive cold, and condense on their ice drains, even if their tanks (in kevlar) contain compressed air at temperatures equal to or higher than those of the surrounding environment. In fact, the air is made up of 78% molecular nitrogen.

Use in the distillation of seawater by condensation
Withdraw the relatively warm seawater (20-40 ° C) present in the bays and lagoons of the tropical atolls, heating it further with parabolic mirrors, or gas burners at about 60-80 ° C, and then making it "evaporate" in a container low pressure tin (at about 70-80% of atmospheric pressure), it can be condensed in a subsequent container at about 5-10 ° C, cooled inside a coaxial container with a non-toxic working liquid (like ethanol) and with a low melting point, which in turn is cooled by passing around a tank of liquid nitrogen. Connecting the evaporation tank to the condensation tank with a large pipe equipped with low pressure air turbines also generates electricity.

In the evaporation tank the salt concentration will increase considerably, and therefore the container must be emptied periodically. The hot residual water obtained, with a high salt concentration, can be placed in outdoor basins from where, after some time, the common cooking sea salt (NaCl) will be obtained by evaporation. The working fluid (for example ethanol), coming into contact with sea water, is brought to temperatures around 20-25 ° C which can be useful for air conditioning.

Nitrogen production (from air)
Liquid nitrogen is generated by cryogenic freezers and condensers or by the compression obtained by a refrigerated Stirling engine, bringing the common air to pressures and temperatures that can induce the main component of the air to change phase, in the liquid state. nitrogen (N 2, equal to 78% of the air we breathe). These cooling systems can be powered by renewable energy generating electricity or through the direct exploitation of mechanical work (with the Stirling engine) obtained from wind turbines or hydraulic turbines, better if located in cold climates.

Liquid nitrogen is produced and stored in special insulated containers: the isolation, minimizing the heat flow towards the inside of the container, reduces the loss of nitrogen due to evaporation and re-transformation into gas. Storage requirements prevent the distribution of nitrogen through pipes: it would be uneconomical to keep the entire pipeline at the required temperature.

Using the Stirling engine in reverse
The consumption of liquid nitrogen would be nothing more than the inverse of its production: the same Stirling engine that made liquid nitrogen re-transform it into gas, recovering the energy spent in the liquefaction process and providing a source of power for motor vehicles and electric generators. It would also be possible to directly use liquid nitrogen as refrigerant for refrigerators and air conditioners, then allowing the resulting gas nitrogen to return to the atmosphere from which it was extracted.

Advantages
Liquid nitrogen vehicles are comparable in many ways to electric vehicles, but use liquid nitrogen to store the energy instead of batteries. Their potential advantages over other vehicles include:

Much like electrical vehicles, liquid nitrogen vehicles would ultimately be powered through the electrical grid, which makes it easier to focus on reducing pollution from one source, as opposed to the millions of vehicles on the road.
Transportation of the fuel would not be required due to drawing power off the electrical grid. This presents significant cost benefits. Pollution created during fuel transportation would be eliminated.
Lower maintenance costs
Liquid nitrogen tanks can be disposed of or recycled with less pollution than batteries.
Liquid nitrogen vehicles are unconstrained by the degradation problems associated with current battery systems.
The tank may be able to be refilled more often and in less time than batteries can be recharged, with re-fueling rates comparable to liquid fuels.
It can work as part of a combined cycle powertrain in conjunction with a petrol or diesel engine, using the waste heat from one to run the other in a turbocompound system. It can even run as a hybrid system.

Disadvantages
The principal disadvantage is the inefficient use of primary energy. Energy is used to liquefy nitrogen, which in turn provides the energy to run the motor. Any conversion of energy has losses. For liquid nitrogen cars, electrical energy is lost during the liquefication process of nitrogen.

Liquid nitrogen is not available in public refueling stations; however, there are distribution systems in place at most welding gas suppliers and liquid nitrogen is an abundant by-product of liquid oxygen production.

Other Uses
In 2008, the US Patent Office granted a patent on a liquid nitrogen powered turbine engine. The turbine flash-expands liquid nitrogen that is sprayed into the high-pressure section of the turbine, and the expanding gas is combined with incoming pressurized air to produce a high-velocity stream of gas that is ejected from the back of the turbine. The resulting gas stream can be used to drive generators or other devices. The system has not been demonstrated to power electric generators of greater than 1 kW, however higher output may possible.

Political arguments
The possibility of making the current thermal engines adaptable to liquid nitrogen and the achievement of different means of production could probably lead to the diversification, localization and stability of the energy market. [ without source ]

One possibility of energy diversification includes hydrogen economy, photovoltaics and biofuels alternatives.

The dependence on the oil economy [ broken link ] has a dramatic global influence. Oil reserves, wells and oil fields are authentic " assets " of current political and monetary power, which governs and monopolizes information. Moreover, according to the theory of peak oil, by 2015 oil consumption will exceed the maximum production capacity, leading to a further surge in prices.

Currently large economic investments, and considerable political and military efforts are aimed at ensuring the long-term stability of coal, oil and gas supplies, and this urgent necessity shapes the policies and military actions of many countries, which to secure energy supplies. they often renounce the struggle for human rights.

From an environmental point of view, the impact generated by the carbon dioxide produced by fossil fuels is (together with deforestation) one of the main causes of the greenhouse effect. Other collateral damage produced by fossil fuels is acid rain, devastation of the landscape, pollution of the aquifer and the seas. It is vital to find alternatives to fossil fuels that allow long-distance storage and transport of energy.

Criticisms

Cost of production
Liquid nitrogen production is an energy-intensive process. Currently practical refrigeration plants producing a few tons/day of liquid nitrogen operate at about 50% of Carnot efficiency. Currently surplus liquid nitrogen is produced as a byproduct in the production of liquid oxygen.

Energy density of liquid nitrogen
Any process that relies on a phase-change of a substance will have much lower energy densities than processes involving a chemical reaction in a substance, which in turn have lower energy densities than nuclear reactions. Liquid nitrogen as an energy store has a low energy density. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels, by comparison, have a high energy density. A high energy density makes the logistics of transport and storage more convenient. Convenience is an important factor in consumer acceptance. The convenient storage of petroleum fuels combined with its low cost has led to an unrivaled success. In addition, a petroleum fuel is a primary energy source, not just an energy storage and transport medium.

The energy density — derived from nitrogen's isobaric heat of vaporization and specific heat in gaseous state — that can be realised from liquid nitrogen at atmospheric pressure and zero degrees Celsius ambient temperature is about 97 watt-hours per kilogram (W•h/kg). This compares with 100-250 W•h/kg for a lithium-ion battery and 3,000 W•h/kg for a gasoline combustion engine running at 28% thermal efficiency, 30 times the density of liquid nitrogen used at the Carnot efficiency.

For an isothermal expansion engine to have a range comparable to an internal combustion engine, a 350-litre (92 US gal) insulated onboard storage vessel is required. A practical volume, but a noticeable increase over the typical 50-litre (13 US gal) gasoline tank. The addition of more complex power cycles would reduce this requirement and help enable frost free operation. However, no commercially practical instances of liquid nitrogen use for vehicle propulsion exist.

Frost formation
Unlike internal combustion engines, using a cryogenic working fluid requires heat exchangers to warm and cool the working fluid. In a humid environment, frost formation will prevent heat flow and thus represents an engineering challenge. To prevent frost build up, multiple working fluids can be used. This adds topping cycles to ensure the heat exchanger does not fall below freezing. Additional heat exchangers, weight, complexity, efficiency loss, and expense, would be required to enable frost free operation.

Safety
However efficient the insulation on the nitrogen fuel tank, there will inevitably be losses by evaporation to the atmosphere. If a vehicle is stored in a poorly ventilated space, there is some risk that leaking nitrogen could reduce the oxygen concentration in the air and cause asphyxiation. Since nitrogen is a colorless and odourless gas that already makes up 78% of air, such a change would be difficult to detect.

Cryogenic liquids are hazardous if spilled. Liquid nitrogen can cause frostbite and can make some materials extremely brittle.

As liquid N2 is colder than 90.2K, oxygen from the atmosphere can condense. Liquid oxygen can spontaneously and violently react with organic chemicals, including petroleum products like asphalt.

Since the liquid to gas expansion ratio of this substance is 1:694, a tremendous amount of force can be generated if liquid nitrogen is rapidly vaporized. In an incident in 2006 at Texas A&M University, the pressure-relief devices of a tank of liquid nitrogen were sealed with brass plugs. As a result, the tank failed catastrophically, and exploded.

Tanks
The tanks must be designed to safety standards appropriate for a pressure vessel, such as ISO 11439.

The storage tank may be made of:

Steel
Aluminium
Carbon fiber
Kevlar
other materials, or combinations of the above.

The fiber materials are considerably lighter than metals but generally more expensive. Metal tanks can withstand a large number of pressure cycles, but must be checked for corrosion periodically. Liquid nitrogen, LN2, is commonly transported in insulated tanks, up to 50 litres, at atmospheric pressure. These tanks, being non-pressurized tanks, are not subject to inspection. Very large tanks for LN2 are sometimes pressurized to less than 25 psi to aid in transferring the liquid at point of use.

Emission output
Like other non-combustion energy storage technologies, a liquid nitrogen vehicle displaces the emission source from the vehicle's tail pipe to the central electrical generating plant. Where emissions-free sources are available, net production of pollutants can be reduced. Emission control measures at a central generating plant may be more effective and less costly than treating the emissions of widely dispersed vehicles.

Source from Wikipedia

Aristotelian realist philosophy of mathematics In the philosophy of mathematics, Aristotelian realism holds that mathematics studies propert...